I am not too sure why this is news today as this was reported sometime ago (late summer / early autumn?).Also, the link is misleading as the article mentions £1.5 million for translations of documents and meetings.This is incorrect reporting because documents are translated but meetings have simultaneous interpretation.What I find extraordinary is that, as members of the EU which the UK still is, all contributions paid to the EU include the administration of the Commission which, by definition, incorporates the running of meetings. The translation of documents is normally to three working languages (English, French and German) as well as simultaneous interpretation at meetings. The number of official languages in the EU is 24 and all of them are used only when the Parliament meets.I think something somewhere has been lost in translation.
Ivonne Holliday ● 2861d