Forum Topic

What did the EU ever do for us?

What did the EU ever do for us? Not much, apart from:• providing 57% of our trade;• structural funding to areas hit by industrial decline;• clean beaches and rivers;• cleaner air;• lead free petrol;• restrictions on landfill dumping;• a recycling culture;• cheaper mobile charges;• cheaper air travel;• improved consumer protection and food labelling;a ban on growth hormones and other harmful food additives;• better product safety;• single market competition bringing quality improvements and better industrial performance;• break up of monopolies;• Europe-wide patent and copyright protection;• no paperwork or customs for exports throughout the single market;• price transparency and removal of commission on currency exchanges across the Eurozone;• freedom to travel, live and work across Europe;• funded opportunities for young people to undertake study or work placements abroad;• access to European health services;• labour protection and enhanced social welfare;• smoke-free workplaces;• equal pay legislation;• holiday entitlement;• the right not to work more than a 48-hour week without overtime;• strongest wildlife protection in the world;• improved animal welfare in food production;• EU-funded research and industrial collaboration;• EU representation in international forums;• bloc EEA negotiation at the WTO;• EU diplomatic efforts to uphold the nuclear non-proliferation treaty;• European arrest warrant;• cross border policing to combat human trafficking, arms and drug smuggling; counter terrorism intelligence;• European civil and military co-operation in post-conflict zones in Europe and Africa;• support for democracy and human rights across Europe and beyond;• investment across Europe contributing to better living standards and educational, social and cultural capital.All of this is nothing compared with its greatest achievements: the EU has for 60 years been the foundation of peace between European neighbours after centuries of bloodshed.It furthermore assisted the extraordinary political, social and economic transformation of 13 former dictatorships, now EU members, since 1980.Now the union faces major challenges brought on by neoliberal economic globalisation, and worsened by its own systemic weaknesses. It is taking measures to overcome these. We in the UK should reflect on whether our net contribution of £7bn out of total government expenditure of £695bn is good value. We must play a full part in enabling the union to be a force for good in a multi-polar global future.The above was written by Simon Sweeney, lecturer in international political economy at the University of York, and illustrates what we are in danger of throwing away as a result of the absurd decision to leave the EU.

Richard Carter ● 2813d65 Comments

Thomas, some of these advantages would no longer be available to us as a third country outside the EU, while others will no longer have their minimum standard legislation underpinning ours, which means the government of the day could reduce or remove those minimum standards completely:No longer available to us:• providing 57% of our trade;• structural funding to areas hit by industrial decline;• Europe-wide patent and copyright protection;• no paperwork or customs for exports throughout the single market;• price transparency and removal of commission on currency exchanges across the Eurozone;• freedom to travel, live and work across Europe;• funded opportunities for young people to undertake study or work placements abroad;• access to European health services;• EU-funded research and industrial collaboration;• EU representation in international forums;• bloc EEA negotiation at the WTO;• EU diplomatic efforts to uphold the nuclear non-proliferation treaty;• European arrest warrant;• cross border policing to combat human trafficking, arms and drug smuggling; counter terrorism intelligence;• European civil and military co-operation in post-conflict zones in Europe and Africa;• support for democracy and human rights across Europe and beyond;• investment across Europe contributing to better living standards and educational, social and cultural capital.Minimum standards could be reduced or removed by the government of the day:• clean beaches and rivers;• cleaner air;• lead free petrol;• restrictions on landfill dumping;• a recycling culture;• improved consumer protection and food labelling;• a ban on growth hormones and other harmful food additives;• better product safety;• the right not to work more than a 48-hour week without overtime;• strongest wildlife protection in the world;• improved animal welfare in food production;• labour protection and enhanced social welfare;• smoke-free workplaces;• equal pay legislation;• holiday entitlement;I haven’t included these, as either it would be up to the industry, or I simply don’t know:• cheaper mobile charges;• cheaper air travel;• single market competition bringing quality improvements and better industrial performance;• break up of monopolies;

Clare Noeken ● 2812d

In the absence of any coherent answer from the Brexiteers (why am I not surprised at that?), here's a couple of paras from Simon Schama's essay in the FT yesterday ("When Britain chose Europe," https://www.ft.com/content/68c8efa8-39df-11e9-b72b-2c7f526ca5d0 which doesn't seem to be behind the paywall):"The Great Recession [of 2008] and, more to the point, the grossly unequal distribution of the recovery, has put all this in jeopardy, not just in Britain but everywhere. Suddenly disparities between regions, sectors of the economy (manufacturing vs services) and social groups seemed brutally intolerable. Many of the problems are rooted in long-term structural shifts: automation; weak demand for non-Asian assembled manufactures. But raw fury needs someone rather than something to blame, and thus was born the mythical enemy: the unassimilable, crime-prone, slave-wage hungry immigrant, and their manipulative masters, the rootless, cosmopolitan “elite”, be they “faceless” Brussels bureaucrat or the international villain George Soros.And so the dreamers fall back into the arms, not of the true history of our country — with its endless successive waves of immigrants, Protestant, Jewish, Muslim, its tenuous union of four nations in one kingdom (minus, not so long ago, Scotland), reigned over by immigrant dynasties, Scots and German — but instead of an imaginary, sempiternal, unchanging ur-Albion, unnaturally indentured to alien continental masters and groaning to be returned to its own true sovereign self. It’s not surprising that there has been an abysmal failure on the part of Brexiters to offer a clear and credible sense of Britain’s eventual destination, because the ecstasy of departure was always more important than any sort of eventual arrival. As attempts to conclude trade deals with major trading partners such as Japan and China (rather than the Faroe Islands and Liechtenstein) freeze in failure, the “Global Britain” vision promised by Brexit is laid bare as the pathetic fantasy it always was."But the whole article is worth reading, not least for the historical perspective it casts on the absurd, self-harming Brexit farce.

Richard Carter ● 2810d