I've read it, Lucille, and it's appalling.I went through that Davies report and just about every page has facts which make it quite clear that expansion at Heathrow is just plain wrong, whether it's cost, environmental damage, pollution, noise, number of people affected. "But we'll recommend Heathrow nevertheless". Beggars belief.Do you read Alistair Osborne's column in the Times business section? For a few years he's battered Heathrow's flawed case - pointed out, for instance, that they pay out in dividends to their mostly foreign shareholders just about more than the profits. Has no effect, of course, but his cogent arguments make me feel better. At least someone in print understands.
Elizabeth Balsom ● 2789d