Forum Topic

Sue, "the whole reason its remaining toxic is because many Remainers won't accept the democratic result."I think it is time for honesty as this statement is as worn out as untrue.The 2016 referendum resulted in a leave vote.  Agreed?I called it a vote from the heart but what was missing were the practicalities.  Agreed?The remain "camp" did not need to do much explaining because it was for the status quo.  I do agree that the campaign the run was woeful, but so was that of the leave camp. Agreed?Nigel Farage in an interview on ITV a few hours after the results were announced said that the £350m to the NHS would be difficult to put into practice.  He further said that controlling immigration was going to be difficult.  Agreed?I think it was you (but not 100% sure) who asked if the result of the referendum should be overturned and I said no.Then the crunch came with the Withdrawal Agreement proposed by Theresa May.  The Brexiteers were up in arms because it was not was not drastic enough.  The remainers were up in arms because the current agreement was far better that the one proposed in the Withdrawal Agreement.  Agreed?Parliament voted down the Agreement three times, rather categorically, because of these reasons.  Agreed?Parliament further voted (albeit a non-binding vote) that a no-deal was not acceptable.  Agreed?The toxicity on this Forum reflects the toxicity that exists in the whole country and Parliament reflects this too.The reason for the toxicity comes from practicalities in implementing the leave vote.  The how? was never considered properly before triggering Article 50, neither were there cross-party consultations.  Not long ago, it was either Jeremy Hunt or Matt Hancock who said, vote for the agreement and think of the practicalities later.  And this is the crunch of all toxicity.As the saying goes, the devil is in the detail.  Agreed? A

Ivonne Holliday ● 2724d