This all started with a post from Ruth Pates (22/09/19 @ 12:00) saying that “Wandsworth [was] embarrassingly inefficient at installing cycling infrastructure” and going on to compare Wandsworth with Lambeth's much more proactive policy on cycling provision. Then anti-cycling people weighed in with complaints about the behaviour of some cyclists, using this to attack all cyclists and cycling provision. I responded by propounding a new version of Godwin's Law thus:
"As an online discussion on cycling issues grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving lycra louts or cyclists jumping red lights approaches 1."
And sure enough, Andy Pike (at 18:40:00 today) bears it out. Congratulations.
I stand by that first paragraph but not by the second. Although what Andy wrote was along the same lines as the others had, I did not, as I now freely admit I should have, make any reference to his cousin's serious injury and the resulting consequences, all of which flowed from completely unacceptable behaviour on the part of the one who caused these. That was wrong and unsympathetic, so even at this late stage let me express my regrets and send my sympathies to his cousin. I hope it's not too late for that.
Richard Carter ● 2606d