Forum Topic

I agree this has been true for a long time.  Of course steps to take to address this, like the climate crisis itself need to be taken globally but they tricky politicallyI think some are already, and I don’t think it’s necessary to automatically kill people as they reach a certain age like in Logan’s run!  (I do agree that people should be able to end their lives as they grow older with painful conditions if they so wish and suspect this will be in place long before I am that stage)A couple of simple measures that could be taken (to howls of protest to some no doubt):-Two non controversial ones- far wider access to contraceptives globally (I believe this is already being pursued to some extent)- improve women’s education in the developing world (some progress but needs to be more) - I believe a clear link between women’s education and declining birth ratesMore controversially in the U.K. (but I think elsewhere too):-- restrict child benefit and tax credits so none payable for any children after 3 or 4 (if you can pay for them yourselves fine but don’t expect others to after a sensible number)- ban or restrict religious or cultural teachings that subjugate women to men’s property with little say- restrict or stop aid to countries which are not taking active steps to reduce or stop their population expansion- where aid is given integrate it to support a sustainable population.  The example here I remember is band aid/ live aid from when I was young when money was raised for the horrible drought at the time in Ethiopia to save lives but I’ve always wondered if that has caused more suffering than it stopped by causing more famine and death one or two generations further down the line.  Not something we are good at I think, the long term planning part.There are no easy routes without upsetting some but I think the indiscriminate right to have as many children as you like should be consigned to history It’s already late to be starting this debate!

Mike Warman ● 2590d