Forum Topic

Im a little confused so I hope people will indulge me for a moment while I recap from the various comments above. I hope that someone would be kind enough to correct me if I’ve got anything wrong. Someone (Matt, I think) has a job with Extinction Rebellion. For which he is paid £400 a week. £400 a week is less than the London Living Wage. I am not sure what the job is but I think someone mentioned PR. A career which tends to be staffed by people who have invested in further education and for which the average salary levels of anyone with two years or more experience is greater than £400. Even outside of London. Someone else (Andy, I think) complains that Matt is quite well paid and expresses jealousy that he is earning £400. Andy had formerly worked for Wandsworth Borough Council. Wandsworth Borough Council is a Living Wage employer and pays all of its employers at least the London Living Wage. Which means Andy would have earned more than Matt. Someone else (Paul, I think) points out that 30% of households live on an income of under £400. The average household income is £28,000, so this may be a slight exaggeration. But I’m happy to run with it, as I’m not too sure of the point being made here. Is it that Matt has a job that pays considerably less than average but should survive on even less than that? Is it that despite earning less than average he should spend his free time visiting people who are paid £30 a day less than him and who aren’t living in a Putney bubble? I’m sure I’m not the only one confused.

Andrew Thomas ● 2583d