Forum Topic

Guardian article today... Published on Sat 30 May 2020 06.00 BSTWe’re not highly trained – we’ve been sitting around doing nothing. This programme is not fit to bring Britain out of lockdownBoris Johnson tells Britain that our test-and-tracing system will be “world-beating”. Here’s what I’ve witnessed from the inside.In March, I was furloughed by my employer. The financial impact was huge, and I decided to look for some temporary work to help with the bills. I saw an online ad for a temporary “customer service adviser”, which said: “You must have your own computer and high-speed internet to download our software and communicate with our customers … Don’t let lockdown stop you getting your dream job.”I have some experience in customer service, so I applied, and was then telephoned by someone who asked me some basic questions about customer service. He said my answers were great, and proceeded to tell me the role was working on the government’s new track-and-trace programme. They would like to offer me a role, and I could start training the following Sunday.On my first day, I logged in and was put into an online chatroom with my new colleagues. There were about 100 of us, and it was soon pretty clear that people were having problems accessing the system correctly. Our trainer dipped in now and then, saying the training would start in 10 mins – 10 mins later, they would repeat the message.  Nearly two hours later the training began, but people were still having problems – at which point they were told there was nothing more they could do.I checked my schedule and saw that I was due to start the next day at 9am. Panic set inThe training was very basic. We saw some slides about our role – the public health website we will use, and a script for what we had to say to people. We were told do not go off-script, and if there was anything we could not answer, we should ask our supervisor. The training was wrapped up early, and we were asked if we felt prepared. There was a chorus of no from many people. Some said yes, but I didn’t see how anyone could be prepared for something they’d only found out about a couple of hours ago, plus we hadn’t even accessed the specific programmes. I checked my schedule and saw that I was due to start the next day at 9am. Panic set in. AdvertisementThe trainer told us there was a further seven and a half hours of self-led training that we had to complete before “going live”. This seemed a little unfair, if not impossible to achieve by the next morning. We were reassured that we could probably get through the training in two to three hours – but we would be paid for all seven and a half.The trainer declared the training over and was immediately inundated with more questions from those anxious about what to do and when. The chatroom was then closed by the trainer, and were left on our own.The self-led courses were very basic – with some generic dos and don’ts about customer data, security and so on. I completed it all in less than one and a half hours, with a score of 95%+.The next morning I was worried, and feeling very unprepared. I felt the job was an important thing to do. But it was essential to get this right, and I didn’t really understand the role and how to use the systems. I logged in and saw a message saying I would be invited to a chatroom and to please wait.I waited seven and a half hours (my entire shift). I called the HR helpline after about one hour and was told to relax – everyone is waiting.The next day I was scheduled to work again. This time, I was invited to a chatroom. I recognised many of the names in the group from my training, so knew the other people were also new. Many people were writing, “Did anyone do anything yesterday?” “Do we just wait?” “What are waiting for?”The questions quickly turned to complaint, and we were left unsupervised for hours. A message then appeared asking us to complete our online training – which was met with a chorus of “I did the training”. The day passed as we waited, re-attempted training, and wrote messages to supervisors and got no response.Wednesday came (day four) and we got a message assuring us that we were getting paid – and to please wait. The comments came in “LOL getting paid by the government for this”, and “they’ll be clapping for us on Thursday”. It went downhill from there, and people started writing derogatory remarks. Others suggested we use the company phone system to practise calling each other on our computers. Again, supervisors didn’t interject or offer any guidance. One person set up a Facebook group (for the people in out chat) and called it Panic Room.That night I saw someone from the track-and-trace programme had spoken to the BBC, and noted that their group had spent the day watching Netflix or playing games online. Having spent days feeling frustrated, I started to feel dejected too.Two days later I logged in for my weekend shift and discovered nothing had changed – and that I had clocked up 40 hours of key worker pay for doing absolutely nothing.After the Dominic Cummings story broke I started hearing more media stories about the track-and-trace programme. Health secretary Matt Hancock claimed that “highly trained track-and-trace staff” were in place. I still had not seen the government system we were supposed to use.Over the next few days I learned more about my job from watching the news than I did from those who were supposed to supervise me. I still did not feel qualified to do it. Then it was announced by Hancock that we were going live the next day. On my chat there was a message from a supervisor asking the more experienced members of our chat to help those who needed help. The blind leading the blind! How were people who started the same day as me, and who had the same short and basic training as I had, supposed to help me do my job?On Thursday, according the government, the system launched. But for me, nothing changed. It was a day of waiting, no system access. Yet on TV at the daily briefing, Boris Johnson told the nation all was well.To this day I remain a “key worker”, paid £10 an hour to sit in a chatroom – alone, lost, without support or help. Despite what the government is saying, it seems the relentless problem “with the system” is another pandemic without a cure. Motivated as I am to help out during this difficult time – and after two weeks of doing “pretend” work on the track-and-trace programme – I have decided to quit and try to find a real way to help people. If Boris Johnson or Matt Hancock are reading this, I’d ask them to please go into the chatrooms you created and read what people are saying. You will see a lot of anger and confusion from a lot of people. And none of them have any faith that we’re properly set up to fight any increase in infection rate from this pandemic.

John Cameron ● 2355d

I heard on the news this morning that four of the SAGE advisers are concerned about the easing of lockdown and the lack of a robust track, trace and isolate system. We seem to have a case of delusional arrogance and ignorance: believe you own lies and continuously repeat them in the hope they might come true eventually? We might have a world beating system in June ... 2021? Even then one can't be sure? What we need is one that is satisfactory and sufficient to stop the spread of CV19 and further reduce deaths, the concerns reported are that we could be heading for a second wave of cases and deaths late June and July without a working system in place. Surely, everyone should expect a system slammed in so quickly to have teething problems; nothing wrong with that but just be open and honest about the issues, especially with the employees operating it, people can then try and work with or around or even just accept such issues. I've been on several conference calls recently and the recommendations from everyone doing working from home successfully was to communicate regularly with you employees - that is, speak to them by phone individually - about their problems and concerns (is that called TLC?). There seems to be a complete failure of leadership and communications in this case: one would think at the very least they they could get the new employees to dcucument all the issues and their concerns and propose possible solutions? It would be better than them wasting time doing nothing and just moaning? Better they communicate these to the thgeir team leaders and bosses than the press and, who knows, some suggestions might even be helpful?

Michael Ixer ● 2354d

Sir David Norgrove letter to Matt Hancock regarding COVID-19 testingDear Secretary of State:On 2 April the Government announced its goal to carry out 100,000 COVID-19 tests a day by the end of April and on 6 May announced its ambition for 200,000 tests a day by the end of May. There has been widespread media coverage of the Government’s progress.I know you are a strong supporter of the proper use of statistics and data and that you will understand that for the sake of clarity and confidence it is important that the target and its context should be set out.It should be clear whether the target is intended to reflect:testing capacity;tests that have been administered;test results received; orthe number of people tested.Each of these is of interest of course, whether or not they are targets.In reporting against this target, sole focus on the total national number of tests could mask helpful operational detail. The way the daily tests data have been broken down by the different ‘pillars’ to illustrate the changing purposes of the programme is useful. Further breakdowns would provide more context, for example through showing the levels of testing by geographical area.The daily data for the UK are currently reported on the gov.uk coronavirus page and a time series is available through the slides and datasets to accompany the daily coronavirus press conferences. However, there is limited detail about the nature and types of testing and it is hard to navigate to the best source of information. It would support trustworthiness for the testing data to be more straightforward to find, with detailed breakdowns and richer commentary.The data around COVID-19 are inevitably complex, which makes it the more important that publications should meet the standards set by the Code of Practice for Statistics. We urge Government to update the COVID-19 national testing strategy to show more clearly how targets are being defined, measured and reported. Measurements will no doubt need to change and develop as we move into new phases for tackling the pandemic.Yours sincerely,Sir David Norgrove

Nicholas Evans ● 2351d

It's interesting how one minute the contact tracing app was going to be the corner stone of a world class testing, tracing and tracking system but now we still have a system without it adequate to allow lockdown to be eased  - something doesn't stack up there - the app has now been now been abandoned with no date set for the replacement one based on the Google-Apple Bluetooth APIs specially developed for these typess of apps. It's worth noting that Germany have produced an app using the approved API which is being released about now and other European countries are close behind. Surely, if these work, the UK could buy into one of them to expedite availability? Otherwise aren't we jeopardising the lifting of lockdown and risking a second peak? The other point to note is I believe there's an EU interoperability standard being developed for contact apps to enable travel between participating countries. If the UK doesn't buy into that do we forget quarantine free travel to parts of Europe? Yesterday Hancock sounded a bit peeved with Apple. I think that he was being disingenuous; there were warnings that going it alone was risky and would most probably fail. Operating systems are complex and Apple-Google have obviously developed a solution that is effective with, one assumes, least disruption to their OSs and the applications that run on them. I can see Apple wouldn't be keen to implement a second custom modification for the NHS as they'd need to ensure it didn't impact on other OS features or applications; an unsubstantiated rumour on Facebook is that Apple didn't want to release any proprietary information to NHSX because of external companies developing the app and the spectre of Dominic Cummings
looming in the background: after the LeaveNow/Cambridge Analytica scandle one could understand that no high tech companies are happy with him - that's just supposition but it would seem to be a sensible attitude for Apple to take as a company very protective of intellectual properly. (Who other than Johnson trusts Cummings?) There is some doubt about whether Bluetooth apps will be that effective. I'm not in a position to comment as I've avoided it as there's always been questions over its security. I was on a Zoom conference a few weeks ago and the advice from an ex Anonymous group hacker (now assisting the Met Police with one of their initiatives) was to turn Bluetooth off; it's an old protocol that's hardly been updated in a couple of decades and it's security reflects
that! Anyway, as someone on Facebook suggested this is the equation defining this government's operations:        ignorance+arrogance+nepotism=failure Some articles on this: https://www.theregister.com/2020/06/19/uk_looks_to_apple_and/ https://www.wired.co.uk/article/nhs-tracing-app-scrapped-apple-google-uk https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/15/coronavirus-germany-to-launch-contact-tracing-app-uk-plans-unclear.html

Michael Ixer ● 2330d