Forum Topic

I think this is where we come back to looking at history with different filters. When I was at school the attrocities of the British Empire were either not talked about or were glossed over; for example, the Indian mutiny was not seen as the fault of the colonial rulers. So, whereas some white British people might look at - shall we say, a Drake statue? - and say he started the slave trade, that was bad but it was a long time ado so I don't consider it relevant, and he gave those Spaniards a jolly good hiding and stole the treasures they stole in South America, so let's keep his statue. Alternatively, someone from the Windrush generation might think: Drake, the evil person that started slavery and is the root of the racism that drove my family into slavery half way across the world and then to come to the UK for a mythical decent living - an now has caused my friends and relatives to be deported, go through agony of being persecuted by the racist British home office; individuals they know might have died because of the poverty, stress of the modern injustice caused to people they know who were British citizens but treated atrociously - they might say:that Drake stature must be removed because he signifies the racism were currently suffering because he started it! So to me that indicates why these statues are a target for removal. Khan, I believe, has sensibly suggested the list should be reviewed to make a considered division on which to remove? Perhaps it wouldn't have been an issue if the BAME citizens had been treated with equality and justice? We all have diffnt perceptions, and I suspect a lot of statues will be removed as a precautionary action now ...

Michael Ixer ● 2343d