Forum Topic

Ms Hammondhttps://www.spiked-online.com/2025/12/20/these-afghan-sex-attacks-cannot-be-ignored/Please read all of this article and your fears and disgust will be shown to be well justified."These Afghan sex attacks cannot be ignored"'Afghanistan is the most misogynistic nation on Earth. Now those attitudes have been brought to Britain'.It describes the cultural background of the majority of boat people and the risks we run from them.'What role are Afghan nationals playing in the recent spate of sexual offences carried out by illegal male migrants?This question is becoming more urgent than ever, with polling showing that most Britons now believe that the small-boats crisis poses a serious threat to the safety of women and girls'.'We should guard against sweeping generalisations about entire nations. Afghanistan, after all, is an incredibly diverse country. But there are hard realities and identifiable trends that can no longer be ignored. According to the Georgetown Institute’s Women, Peace and Security Index, **Afghanistan ranks bottom out of 181 countries on almost every measure of women’s wellbeing, from the threat of partner violence to gender-based political persecution and general women’s safety**.It does seem as if some Afghan nationals now in the UK have brought their society’s deeply misogynistic attitudes with them. Earlier this year, the Telegraph published data drawn from the police national computer which showed that Afghan nationals were more than 20 times more likely to account for sexual-offence convictions than British citizens across England and Wales. In fact, on this metric, Afghan nationals have the highest rate of sex offending among all nationalities.Little wonder, then, that over the past year or so, there has been a string of harrowing sexual-violence cases in the UK involving Afghan nationals. Just this month, two Afghan 17-year-olds, Jan Jahanzeb and Israr Niazal, were jailed over the rape of a 15-year-old girl in the Warwickshire town of Leamington Spa. Ahead of the sentencing, Warwick Crown Court heard an impact statement on behalf of the victim in which she said: ‘The day I was raped changed me as a person. Now every time I go out I don’t feel safe.’I have asked questions of our MP Fleur Anderson regarding the numbers of these boat people, how we are processing them and what we are doing to those that fail the tests for political asylum.I'll post any response if I get one.PS Doubtless Mr Ixer will say that statistically this is unfounded and Mr Ainsworth that I am just showing racial prejudice against Arabs who are only acting in this way because of Tony Blair's and George Bush's attack on Afghanistan in 2001,

John Hawkes ● 20d

Ms Hammond,Then there are the costs of irregular immigration even caused by those granted asylum, calculated by the MAC. Reported in the Spectator -"MAC is ‘an advisory non-departmental public body, sponsored by the Home Office’. It is not a political body, and its board is comprised of sober, sensible academics, who have set out to model ‘net fiscal impact’ – the costs, or benefits to the taxpayer of different kinds of migration.** It’s worth noting that they do not seek to model second- or third-order costs of migration, such as housing costs, crime or long-term suppression of wages and birth rates**. On asylum, the MAC are absolutely clear, stating that they ‘expect the net fiscal impact of those entering through asylum and refugee routes to be unambiguously negative’. The academics explain this is because asylum seekers have ‘low employment rates and wages, high rates of economic inactivity’ and because they are able to claim benefits sooner, being exempt from the ‘no recourse to public funds’ rule. Further, ‘asylum migrants are also much less likely to have earnings at the higher end of the distribution’. The reality is that asylum seekers are not generally doctors or engineers.The report also notes that research in other countries shows a ‘sizeable negative lifetime impact’ from asylum seekers, with a detailed, data-led 2024 study from the Netherlands finding that each migrant granted asylum cost the Dutch state around €400,000 over their lifetime. What might it mean if the UK faced similar costs? Last year 108,138 people claimed asylum here. Around half of them were granted asylum at ‘initial decision’, but after appeal we should expect at least two-thirds to have their claim granted, based on previous years. This would mean that just for 2024’s asylum seekers we should expect around 70,000 to have their claim granted, meaning a lifetime cost to British taxpayers of around £25 billion. And that figure doesn’t include the costs of housing them before their claims are granted, nor of any crimes they might commit and any prison sentences they might receive".

John Hawkes ● 23d

Michael, the European Convention on Human Rights may not be immediately relevant in every case but there is no doubt that both foreign criminals and illegal migrants abuse the Convention to avoid deportation. This is even recognised by Keir Starmer, but rather than supporting the Conservative policy of withdrawing from the Convention, he proposes instead to disapply certain clauses, such as the right to family life, at least in the extreme interpretation given by the European judges. However  the government has not yet published its plan. There is no guarantee in any case that the judges of the European Court, many of them judicial activists, would allow the UK to disapply any part of the Convention. And it is not clear that Labour backbench MPs would agree to any derogation from the Convention.The ECHR seems to be a totemic issue for many on the left, uniting different strands of opinion. Remainers generally regard anything that begins with the word European as good and wise, regarding the prefix British as narrow minded and insular. Internationalists think that if the UK withdrew from the Convention  it would become a pariah state, forgetting that many vibrant democracies like Australia, New Zealand and the United States have not signed up to the Convention or anything similar. And the human rights lobby believe that if the UK withdrew , British people would no longer have any rights, forgetting that many,  if not all, of the rights detailed in the Convention have been enshrined in British law for centuries. Indeed the Convention was largely drafted by a British lawyer in the aftermath of the Second World War to reflect the traditions of democracies like Britain and France.

Steven Rose ● 33d

Ms HammondMore interesting yet shocking background to this abhorrent crime from the Spectator which shows it is very much not unique.The background of the perpetrators however is.'On 10 May this year a 15-year-old girl was with friends near parkland on the outskirts of Leamington Spa. Shortly after 9 p.m. she was separated from those friends and abducted by Jan Jahanzeb, a 17-year-old Afghan asylum seeker who arrived in the UK in January. The victim had the quick thinking to record the start and aftermath on her phone, so footage of the incident exists. As a result we know that while she was being taken away from her friends, the girl screamed for help, but Jahanzeb placed his hand over her mouth.From that video we also know that Jahanzeb called his friend Israr Niazal, another Afghan asylum seeker. During that call, conducted in Pashto, Jahanzeb said ‘Oh my god, I’m a Muslim in one minute’. (Does this mean he believes that raping a white non-Muslim girl enhances him in the eyes of fellow Muslims ? - JH)Jahanzeb was sentenced to ten years and eight months. Deportation papers have already been issued to him. Niazal received a sentence of nine years and ten months. According to his barrister, Niazal is still seeking asylum and intends ‘to make a life in this country after he has been released.’ (sic)Were this an isolated incident it would be horrifying enough. But of course, it isn’t. Yesterday, Croydon Magistrates’ Court sentenced Iraqi asylum seeker Hawre Mohamed to eight months in prison for sexually assaulting a 20-year-old woman at Horley railway station on 22 September. When Mohamed is released from prison in two months’ time he will be able to continue his application for asylum.Last month at Warwick Crown Court, Ahmad Mulakhil, an Afghan, pleaded guilty to raping a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton.On 13 November, Amin Abedi Mofrat, an Iranian asylum seeker, was sentenced to nine years and six months in prison for the rape of a 15-year-old schoolgirl in Oxford.On 1 November Eid Anwar Fathi Najjar, an illegal migrant from Egypt, pleaded guilty to marching a woman out of a York nightclub and raping her in an alleyway.The list goes on.Every single one of these horrific crimes is not just a tragedy. Every single one of these crimes is entirely avoidable.As Rob Bates, Director of the Centre for Migration Control has said, ‘we know that the nationalities coming across on the boats are hugely overrepresented in crime statistics… These men should never have been in the country. The barbarism seen in Leamington Spa, and towns across the country are the direct result of an asylum system that extends every generosity and largesse to illegal migrants whilst viewing the safety of British citizens as nothing but an inconvenient afterthought.Every single one of these horrific crimes is not just a tragedy. Every single one of these crimes is entirely avoidable.That’s the truth. The British state, aided by activists and charities, is choosing every day to import men it knows pose a substantial risk of sexually assaulting, raping or even murdering innocent Brits. This is a the result of choices made by politicians, civil servants and judges every single day.This means that the state, along with its open borders mercenaries are ultimately responsible for every single one of these crimes. Never let them forget that'.

John Hawkes ● 33d