Forum Topic

Tories 2025 disavow Tories 2021, including themselves. Prefer to heap blame on Starmer

Totally predictably Alaa Abd el-Fattah has come up on the Forum. So I asked AI:-Who gave UK citizenship to Alaa Abd el-Fattah?"Alaa Abd el-Fattah was granted British citizenship in December 2021 while the Conservative Party was in government under Prime Minister Boris Johnson. His citizenship was processed through his mother, Laila Soueif, a London-born mathematics professor. Key details regarding the grant of his citizenship include: Legal Basis: He acquired citizenship through a 2021 change in immigration law that allows mothers to transmit British citizenship to their children born abroad.Home Secretary: Priti Patel served as the Home Secretary at the time the citizenship was granted.Immigration Minister: Chris Philp was the Immigration Minister when the application was approved.Diplomatic Context: The citizenship was sought by his family as a "get out of jail card" to increase diplomatic pressure on Egypt to release him from prison.Following his arrival in the UK in late 2025, several of the officials who initially supported his case—including Chris Philp and other Conservative MPs—have called for his citizenship to be revoked due to the emergence of past social media posts they labeled as "abhorrent"."Also AI:-"Source of "Islamist" Label: In late December 2025, some British media outlets and political figures (such as Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch and MP Robert Jenrick) used the term "alleged Islamist extremist" to describe him. These labels were primarily based on unearthed historical social media posts from 2010–2012 that contained violent rhetoric against Zionists and the police, rather than an adherence to Islamist ideology."Poor Starmer.

David Ainsworth ● 13d68 Comments

StevenYet another excellent and balanced analysis not only of the creation of Israel and the current Middle East conflict but also the prejudice of many if not most writers and academics.Including Naomi Klein a professor of 'climate justice' (sic).This group includes the majority of posters on the subject on this Forum, though for them the adjective academic regarding their comments is surely stretching a point.Most impressive is the fact that your comments are obviously based upon the exercise of your own intelligence and not the artificial substitute that the likes of Mr Ainsworth need to deploy.And your quoting the actual barbaric words of Abd El-Fattah attacking both the Jews and the British state, one whose citizenship he is so afraid of being deprived of, gives the lie to the claim he is just an innocent at large regarding his postings and is in fact a fine example of Britishness - albeit he is an Egyptian.Lucy Connolly was jailed for tweets (quickly withdrawn as you point out) posted in anger following the killing of three young girls by Axel Rudakubana, an act most on this Forum would abhor.In court he also admitted producing the biological toxin ricin and a charge under the Terrorism Act related to possessing an al-Qaeda training manual.I would suspect Naomi Klein, other Guardianistas and some on this Forum would plead the Monty Python defence - "he's not an Islamic terrorist; he's just a naughty boy". Why do so many not see the evil in Islamism and its threat to this country and the world at large whilst perpetually pleading on behalf of Islamists ?

John Hawkes ● 11d

An article in today's 'Guardian' by Naomi Klein, professor of 'climate justice' at the University of British Columbia, in which she presents arguments in defence of Abd El-Fattah, demonstrates everything that wrong with the bien pensant left in this country and North America. She describes the calls for Abd El-Fattah's citizenship to be revoked as a 'manufactured storm', pointing out that he has also praised 'brave anti-Zionist Jews' and spoken out against the Egyptian military when they fired on a peaceful protest by Coptic Christians. She writes:'Do these posts cancel out the ones that say the exact opposite'? No. But they do do make it harder to turn Abd El-Fattah into the unrecognisably menacing "anti-white Islamist" figure currently flooding the Internet'.  No doubt this stuff goes down well with hundreds of 'Guardian' readers, eager to have their prejudices against Israel confirmed and to read that the fear of Islamism is a phobia manufactured by the right wing. I should like to make two points. The first is that anti-Zionism is a modern form of anti-Semitism. Israel was created with the assent of the UN in the aftermath of the war as a homeland for Jewish people, probably the most persecuted group in the last two thousand years. Anti-Zionism, which calls for the destruction of the Jewish State, would leave millions of Jews, the majority of whom nowadays are the descendants of people who fled from persecution in North Africa and the Middle East rather then Europe, living as a minority (if they were allowed to live) as a minority in a Muslim state. The advocacy of this outcome by Naomi Klein, a Jewish academic safely ensconced in British Columbia, can exactly be described as a 'luxury belief'. Secondly it is worth remembering what Abd El-Fattah actually wrote. He described the killing of Zionists as 'heroic' and said that 'we need to kill more of them'. He said the police 'don't have rights, we should just kill them all'. He described vBritish people as 'dogs and monkeys'. He  called for  Downing Street to be burned down etc. etc. Now those calling for Abd El-Fattah's citizenship to be revoked are not saying that he is the most evil man on the planet. No doubt at times he has expressed more acceptable political views, such as the defence of Coptic Christians. But these, as Naomi Klein herself admits, do not cancel out the hate speech repeated over hundred of tweets. In 2024 Lucy Connolly was given a 31 month prison sentence for a tweet in which she advocated burning down asylum hotels. What is the difference between Abd El-Fattah and Lucy Connolly? Would the 'Guardian' have printed an article in defence of Lucy Connolly, pointing out she was not a bad person and that she took down the offensive post a couple of hours later and apologised?

Steven Rose ● 11d

"Over 500 missions in 15 monthsAOAV’s analysis of flight-tracking data shows that between 3 December 2023 and 27 March 2025, the RAF carried out at least 518 Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) flights over or close to Gaza’s airspace.Both Labour and Conservative governments have enacted the policy, with at least 215 flights taking place during Keir Starmer’s tenure as prime minister and 303 under Rishi Sunak’s administration.The frequency of flights remained high throughout 2024, with some months seeing as many as 49 sorties. The missions have typically lasted up to six hours, with the longest flight recorded at seven hours and four minutes.While the Ministry of Defence (MoD) claims these flights are solely for locating Israeli hostages held by Hamas, AOAV found that the RAF conducted 24 flights in the two weeks leading up to and including the day of Israel’s deadly attack on the Nuseirat refugee camp on 8 June 2024, which reportedly killed 274 Palestinians and injured over 700. Four Israeli hostages were rescued in the operation; it remains unclear whether British intelligence directly contributed to the attack or was solely used to locate hostages.In another case, an RAF Shadow R1 most likely landed at Israel’s Nevatim Air Base on 13 February 2024 and remained there for two hours before departing. Nevatim is a key Israeli military base and hosts the country’s F-35 squadron, which has carried out extensive airstrikes in Gaza.This is not the only instance where UK ISR flights have coincided with major Israeli military assaults. In the two weeks leading up to Israel’s attack on Rafah on 12 February 2024, which killed at least 67 Palestinians, the RAF flew 15 ISR missions over Gaza. Flights continued even during the so-called ‘limited ceasefire’ in early 2025, with six flights recorded in February alone.With no parliamentary oversight or public scrutiny, it remains unclear how much British intelligence gathered from these flights has been shared with Israel."

David Ainsworth ● 12d

Mr IxerDon't be so naïve in your attempt to show yourself to be fair minded and liberal.'I see he's now apologised for his posts. Perhaps his mother and a word him about his comments?'Of course he has.These Islamists are cunning so-and-sos.They will say anything and recant all their previous racist comments and views to make themselves appear as decent human beings deserving of British citizenship, when such a benefit is challenged.Otherwise they would have to return to and live in their 'failed state' birthplaces.His mother was born here as I believe her mother was studying here at the time of her birth.That's how I understand she can claim to be British.But he was born in EGYPT and bases his claim for retained British citizenship as his mother's middle aged son (sic). Boris Johnson was influential in his gaining British citizenship when at the time Abd El-Fattah was perceived to be 'a fighter for and defender of human rights'.One act of Johnson truly worthy of outright condemnation.'I suppose a few years in an Egyptian prison would make one appreciate life in the UK'.Are you insulting Muslim states by insinuating they operate a cruel and wicked prison regime and also comparing life in such states as socially and politically inferior to that in the UK ?Mr Ainsworth will soon be on your tail for Islamophobia !'so I doubt he's a risk to the UK '.The ultimate naivety.Like all terrorists when about to suffer for their obnoxious views, he has of course recanted his racist and anti-British views and put them down to youthful ignorance and indiscretion.People should Google to read how disgusting they are.'He has repeatedly referred to the British as “dogs and monkeys”, for example, and urged Londoners to burn Downing Street. He has “joked” about taking over towns and “rap[ing] ur women” — just the sort of thing British social cohesion needs amid the backlash over migrant hotels and grooming gangs. And he’s called for killing all police, “hating white people”, and the “random shooting of white males”'. - From Unherd.But under pressure and at risk of being kicked out of the country he so despises and with which he holds no views in common, and returned to his homeland that saw him for what he is years ago, he now claims to be a different person.But you, Starmer, Cooper and Lammy are mugs to believe such.If allowed to stay here he will just be a focus for antisemitic views and a terrorism risk to the security and safety of the British people.'... and who other than an the lawyers will gain?'We will if he is kicked out and the lawyers will soon find other similar 'human rights' cases stemming from our misreading of and adherence to the ECHR and Labour's insouciance regarding who can live in this country and claim citizenship.

John Hawkes ● 12d