Forum Topic

BoycieThanks for the background check on Brenan O'Neill.Sounds somewhat hyperbolic re Brexit or perhaps, because of his literary style, you did not get the subtext of what he said.But I am sure you can substantiate it.I agree his views seemed to have changed since he gave up editorship of Living Marxism, the journal of the Revolutionary Communist Party.On the other hand I might be put down to attaining some sort of adult enlightenment.1 Corinthians 13:11 "When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me".Most of us do.But perhaps not you !You claim he is -'mad for Trump and hates environmentalists....'So he can't be all bad !And that -'His parents were Irish, but he self-identifies as British'.Good taste then.And yet you keep on 'wearing of the green' but decide to live here and colonise Hammersmith rather than return to the Old Sod.Why is that ?'He is what we would describe in Hiberno-English as; an awful feckin' eejit'.So at least we know what language the Christian Bothers left you with after they beat out Gaelic.So sad it was at such a cost resulting in your fetishism regarding the digestive bodily functions !☘️Coming back to O'Neill, you have I take read his article ? https://www.spiked-online.com/2026/04/08/so-irans-civilisation-is-safe-now-what-about-the-wests/If so, someone like you, that is so pro-Islam and anti Western beliefs in general, must have some pertinent comments with which to counter his claims regarding what is essentially a 'clash of civilisations' ?

John Hawkes ● 3d

Yes, Jonathan, Fergal Keane reports with great empathy, but his empathy is selective. In the case of Gaza his empathy was all for the Palestinians civilians caught up in the conflict but not for the Israelis trying to recover their hostages and to neutralise a genocidal terrorist group which had carried out a dreadful massacre, which they threatened to repeat 'again and again'. Night after night, while sitting in Jerusalem, he provided empathetic voiceovers for footage of Gaza filmed by reporters under the control of Hamas. But he never thought to mention this fact to the viewers, a clear breach of the BBC's rules on impartiality. Furthermore the Palestinian civilians interviewed in Fergal Keane's reports were never asked what they thought about Hamas. Anyone watching might be forgiven for thinking that Hamas did not exist and Gaza was entirely populated by innocent civilians deliberately targeted by ruthless Israelis. Of course those who share this point of view (who include most of the staff at the BBC as well as several contributors to Putney Forum) would not detect any bias, conscious or unconscious. They would conclude that Fergal Keane was simply telling the truth and doing an excellent job. And the other night he was doing the same thing in Teheran, empathising with the families traumatised by the American-Israeli missile strikes, but there was no mention in his report of the families who lost their loved ones in the January massacre. But again, those whose antipathy to Trump and Netanyahu outweighs their hostility to the Iranian regime would not be too concerned.

Steven Rose ● 5d

Interesting article from June 2025 by Martin Bell on the difficulties of covering the conflict in Gaza:‘…. the coverage – or rather, the non-coverage – of the conflict between the Israelis and Hamas in Gaza. The broadcasts regularly start with the mantra that the IDF does not allow foreign media access into the Gaza Strip, and proceed with the most vivid coverage, shot by brave freelances and other civilians posting on social media from inside Gaza, of scenes of death and destruction with the commentary voiced remotely in Jerusalem, Ashkelon or London. Often, both print and broadcast media preface the numbers of the dead and injured with a reminder that they were provided by the Hamas-run health ministry – sometimes the only source available.My former colleague Jeremy Bowen said on the Today programme on Wednesday: “Israel doesn’t let us in because it’s doing things there … that they don’t want us to see, otherwise they would allow free reporting.” I’m inclined to agree with him.My sympathies are with Bowen, Fergal Keane and others at the BBC, especially when Donald Trump flings around baseless accusations of bias. The BBC and other responsible news outlets have a difficult line to tread. I cannot speak for the American networks, but the British channels all have excellent reporters standing by in the region, not exactly there but thereabouts, sometimes on the high ground overlooking Gaza, which some reporters call the “hill of shame”. What is missing is the first-hand experience of the war, shared by reporters on the ground who can properly interpret what is happening. This gives free rein to rumour and falsehood.What Bowen and I know from our shared experience is that it is not enough to win the war of weapons without also winning the war of words and images. And the IDF must see that it is losing. It has historically had its ups and downs with the foreign press, but nothing like the present entrenched hostility. It is doing itself great damage, which it is beginning to feel diplomatically.I would urge the following: that the foreign press, especially the TV networks, continue to stand their ground, and that the Israeli press machine does itself a favour and relaxes the rules to allow some independent access to Gaza. This will not only limit the tides of propaganda (on both sides, it must be said) but perhaps hold the frontline troops to higher standards of behaviour, .....'Seems pretty straightforward, let the journalists in!

Gerry Boyce ● 5d

I think I can see why you, Steve, hate Fergal Keane, however, thanks for the opportunity to remind everyone of the quality of his reporting. This is from December 2025.'Abdelrahman aged 11 is a little boy from Gaza who travelled to Jordan to get a new leg - and found that playing a stringed instrument called the oud helped calm him. He'd been helicoptered into Jordan from Gaza for medical treatment, and told the nurse who’d travelled with him he’d come to get a new leg - so he could run with his friends again. Abdelrahman’s father was killed in an Israeli bombing, during the war in Gaza. Abdelrahman was maimed by another Israeli airstrike, next to the school where he was sheltering with his mother and sister. He'd been selling tea at a small stall to raise money for his family. He was taken to hospital, where doctors decided to amputate his leg. Afterwards, his mental state deteriorated, his mum Asma said:“He started pulling his hair and hitting himself hard,” she said. “He became like someone who has depression; seeing his friends playing and running around…and he’s sitting alone.”But the next time (Fergal) met Abdelrahman, he'd had his new prosthetic leg fitted, and he was practising playing an oud. A Jordanian colleague had given him the lute-like instrument, in the hope it might calm his trauma. It made him smile. A few weeks later the family returned to Gaza, but the Israeli Defence Forces searched their vehicle and confiscated the oud. Israel’s Ministry of Defence said, “individuals returning to the Gaza Strip are not permitted to bring in their personal luggage equipment that has not been approved as essential humanitarian aid, without prior coordination.” Sometimes the enormity of the inhumanity is too much to grasp,  Fergal is excellent at finding the small details that resonate so powerfully.

Gerry Boyce ● 6d