Forum Topic

"Kill a Jew; Save the whale. Vote Green !'Green candidate in this week’s council elections says the White House should be blown up, described Hamas taking ‘filthy hostages,’ and denies that anyone was raped by the terror group on 7 October.‘I hope Iran can destroy Israel and leave no-one there,’ writes one member of the group. Shahin replies: ‘Iran should hit the Whitehouse. It is the headquarters for evil’Feda Shahin, a Green candidate in Bournemouth, was first exposed – for different extremist statements – by The Spectator on 21 April. We disclosed she had said that ‘the Zionists killed 20 million Christians’ and that ‘Zionists are trying to control the world.’ She is ‘secretary general’ of a local pro-Palestine group, the Palestine Solidarity Movement, which earned national notoriety after it staged a night-time picket of an MP’s private home.Those remarks were, it turns out, only part of Shahin’s wide repertoire. We have now been passed her conversations in the Palestine Solidarity Movement’s group chat, including her reaction to our previous story about her. This was not, it’s fair to say, shame, apology or regret. Instead, she said The Spectator was running a ‘trolling campaign’ – deliberately posting inflammatory statements to provoke emotional responses.The inflammatory statements were, of course, Shahin’s. Now there are some more to report. In a thread from mid-March, discussion turns to the Iran war. ‘I hope Iran can destroy Israel and leave no-one there,’ writes another member of the group. Shahin replies: ‘Iran should hit the Whitehouse. It is the headquarters for evil.’Shahin was furious about Israel continuing intermittently to bomb Gaza even though a peace deal had been agreed. ‘I am about to go crazy,’ she says. ‘Where are those who agreed the deal? They lied. They got the filthy hostages. It was all about that.’Earlier in the conflict, on her public X account, Shahin appeared to look forward to more hostages being taken. In October 2024, responding to an Israeli commentator demanding the release of the Hamas hostages (who were then still held) and a ceasefire, Shahin replied: ‘They’re going to kidnap [someone else] soon, God willing, so you can visit the kidnapped.’This was something of a U-turn from earlier in the conflict, when she was still trying to deny that Hamas did anything wrong. In November 2023, about seven weeks after the terror group’s attack on Israel, Shahin said Hamas ‘was proven innocent from the killing on 7th Oct.’In January 2024, responding to a post by the journalist Piers Morgan about 7 October saying that ‘raping women’ and ‘murdering Holocaust survivors’ is not ‘legitimate self-defence,’ Shahin replied: ‘You know non[e] of this happened but you keep lying… How much are you paid to spread these lies?’ At least one Holocaust survivor, 91-year-old Moshe Ridler, was murdered in the attacks. The rapes are attested to by numerous victims; the United Nations special representative found ‘reasonable grounds to believe that… rape and gang rape’ occurred in multiple locations; and the International Criminal Court sought arrest warrants for rape for three Hamas commanders (these were later cancelled after the men were killed).

John Hawkes ● 29d

"Why Jews fear Zack PolanskiThe Greens present a deceptively benign countenance"UnHerd 2 May 2026 by Howard Jacobson; a Booker Prize-winning novelist.________________________________________Indulge me a fantasy:–Early morning.  The battlements.Deprived of sleep, the once Director of Public Prosecutions, now mere Prime Minister, steps out in dread and smells the air. A cold Elsinore-like wind blows in, ruffling the laundered lace collar of his hero shirt. He speaks, knowing no one is listening. ‘The time is out of joint. O, cursed spite that ever I was born to set it right.’He has my sympathies. Compare the calamitous disorder confronting Hamlet and Keir Starmer and we have to say Hamlet had it easy. A dead father, a wanton mother, a wicked uncle, a ghost at large, and Fortinbras mustering his forces on the Norwegian border – pfft! Mere domestic inconveniences compared with the things rank and gross in nature that Starmer faces every day: the carping of courtiers calling for a brave new world but lacking the bravery to bring one about; irresponsible rivals tickling the sore spots of a confused and rumour-ridden populace; a ruthless commentariat no less divided but equally athirst for blood; voices prophesying war. Fie on’t, ah fie!Of the external factions aligned against Starmer’s Labour Party in the coming local elections, the most dangerous — to Starmer and the country — are the Greens. Ask how the Greens have transformed themselves in so short a time from a smug but innocuous band of self-marginalising activists to a smug but menacing army of agitators bent on power, and the answer explains what there is to fear from them. They are not what they until recently purported to be. In the image of their new about-facing leader Zack Polanski, they present a deceptively benign countenance. A party ostensibly for children, with policies of redistribution and fairness, promising goodies (even the naughtiest ones) for everyone, they are only a little less ostensibly a party for Jew haters. Yes, the Greens were always hyper-Gaza-concerned, today they are Gaza besotted.Reform has its own obsessions, too, but they are as they describe themselves on the tin. Farage comes over as of-the-turf-turfy and of the saloon-bar-boozy, and makes no attempt to attract voters who don’t like that look. His appeal will fluctuate, as it always has, according to the perceived level of immigrant threat. And yes, that makes the success he might enjoy hard to calculate. But essentially Reformers are old men who stoke one another’s fears. Those fears are by no means all irrational but they are ageing. The Greens however are young, which means that whatever there is to fear from them there is to fear for longer. Against that, of course, is the fickleness of youth. Cheered by tens of thousands at Glastonbury but a blink of time ago, Jeremy Corbyn is now pushing “a new kind of politics” — Your Party, it desperately names itself — in company with Zarah Sultana. How the mighty, etc. But Zack Polanski has an advantage over Corbyn, at least when it comes to baiting Jews — he is a Jew himself. And the appeal to the Jew-uncomfortable of an actual Jew who is no less Jew-uncomfortable than they are, is incalculable. Rarely will a Green party candidate forget to rebut all charges of antisemitism with the reassuring lie, “We cannot be antisemitic. Our leader is a Jewish man” — the phenomenon of a Jew-hating Jew being new to voters who are wet behind the ears.“The appeal to the Jew-uncomfortable of an actual Jew who is no less Jew-uncomfortable than they are, is incalculable.”I don’t mind admitting to my own problem with Zack Polanski, over and above my suspicions about people who change their names and seek to make capital out of doing so. Over the centuries, Jews have changed their names from Mordechai to St John in order to join a golf club. That David Paulden should have changed his name to Zack Polanski is harder to understand, unless there was a Polish golf club in north Manchester that wouldn’t otherwise have considered him for membership. Not that the name Paulden immediately conjures up a Jew. The Pauldens — his paternal grandparents — were good friends of my mother and father. We lived next-door to them in Prestwich. I babysat their children, one of whom would have been the not-yet Zack’s father. My own father briefly drove a van for Benny Paulden who owned a small warehouse. My mother ran a fancy goods shop with Ethel Paulden in a rundown precinct in south Manchester. I had a schoolboy crush on her. The four lie close together for all time in a grim Jewish cemetery in Failsworth. I remember them with immense fondness. Modest, generous business people with a sense of humour, relaxedly Jewish. The Pauldens. A nice name, I think, every time I pause before their graves, on the way to visit my parents’.So why did David Paulden change it? I am not privy to the particular psychology so must accept his explanation that it was a gesture of solidarity with the Jews of the old country. He seems to have taken a while working out who he was. Hence his years as a hypnotist offering to increase the size of a woman’s breasts. Wanting to be loved is as good an explanation as any. And maybe wanting to be taken for a person of high principle. Zack! Well, why not? Z for Zionist, perhaps? Doubt it. Let’s guess it was something more swashbuckling and piratical than that. “A proud Jew”, he has called himself. I wince at the description. What’s wrong with just “Jew”? It’s my experience that people who announce their “proud” adherence to a principle or a faith are usually defectors in waiting. And so it has turned out with this “proud Jew” who shuffles off any residual or complex Zionist or Israel loyalties, any sorrow, any sadness, any hesitancy when it comes to the genocide libel, and only the other day mused aloud that Jews were a little too quick to call out antisemitism while the danger they claim to be facing might be no more than “the perception of unsafety” — this while calling out Islamophobia.His callous “perception of unsafety” argument returned to bite him after the stabbings in Golders Green earlier this week. There is no room for antisemitism he remembered to say in the heat of the horror, careful not to lose a vote, but must have worried how those who rejoice in the killing of Jews would respond to such a remark, hence, as I understand it, another volte face, this time attacking the police for their brutal handling of the suspect. Whoever would face in two directions at once, might learn from Polanski né Paulden — how to be a Jew and not a Jew, how to express sympathy and deny it, how to say what you think, unsay it and then say it again, and how to keep everyone naïve enough to believe a single spurious word you say, on side for long enough to vote for you.It is this transparent falsity cynically manipulating fears and libels and trading shamelessly on the ethnic hostilities of numbers of his supporters, that should concern everyone old enough to cast an intelligent vote. Even those whose identity is flattered by Polanski’s schmoozing should think twice before putting a cross beside his party’s name. Another day, another party, and you will be on the receiving end of equivalent defamations. We don’t need one group of citizens to feel good for a passing minute at the discomfiture of another. The time is out of joint. Yes, it’s hard to know how to put it right. But there is one way not to make things worse. We should not throw in our lot with false promisers and flatterers. We worry about the algorithms that enable social media to sell us the lies we already believe. Extreme political parties are learning to do the same. Whoever promises to give you what research tells them you want is not your friend.________________________________________

John Hawkes ● 30d

I don’t share the admiration which which Jonathan Freedland’s article has been greeted on the Forum. As a Guardianista he can’t resist having a go at Nigel Farage and Kemi Badenoch whom he accuses of ‘seizing on the issue’ of the attacks on the Jewish community, implying that their support is insincere. He even brings up nasty remarks which Farage is alleged to have made as a schoolboy. almost fifty years ago. Well at least Farage and Badenoch have recognised the gravity of the problem of anti-Semitism in this country, unlike Zack Polanski who has suggested that Jews may be imagining Jew- hatred where none exists. And unlike senior Labour members like Wes Streeting and Emily Thornberry who have fuelled anti-Semitism by jumping on the genocide bandwagon. It seems that Freedland can’t bring himself to criticise Labour or the Greens, parties supported  by many of his ‘Guardian readers.Freedland asks why the actors and celebrities who ordinarily waste no time in declaring their solidarity with the oppressed of far-flung nations have been curiously silent when Jews have been stabbed in their own country. He is probably correct when he says  that these luvvies see support for Jews as support for Israel and prefer to keep silent. He invites them to make a distinction between Jews, who like every other ethnic minority have a right to live in safety in this country, and Israel, whose army, he says, without distinguishing between civilians and militants, has killed 70 000 Palestinians and left Gaza in ruins.The trouble with Freedland’s position is that he evidently thinks it is perfectly all right  to go along with the regular one-sided condemnation of Israel in his newspaper and on the BBC and to do so without consequences for the Jewish citizens of this country. This is a delusion. The relentless criticism of Israel, the only Jewish state,  is bound to affect the lives of Jews in the diaspora. The vast majority of British Jews and Jews elsewhere see the continued existence of Israel as vital. They may not agree with all the policies of Netanyahu, they rightly question whether the IDF have been reckless at times in their efforts to eliminate Hamas militants who have sheltered among the civilian population, they certainly disapprove of settler violence on the West Bank. But they support Israel’s right to defend itself from its many enemies, whether Hamas, Hezbollah or Iran.

Steven Rose ● 31d

Ms GrantA passionate and moving comment by someone actually impacted by antisemitism - racist hatred that has been going on for millennia and today is justified as being an 'unintentional side effect' of support for the Palestinians.And a frightening example of the type of country the UK is turning into.I my opinion this 'unintentional side effect' justification is completely untrue.The pro-Palestine marches for example are obviously antisemitic with cries of - "Globalize the Intifada""There is Only One Solution, Intifada Revolution""Resistance By Any Means Necessary" (re October 2023 ?)"From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be free!""Free Palestine""Settler Colonialism" https://www.ajc.org/news/6-pro-palestinian-protest-chants-youve-heard-and-how-theyre-being-used-to-target-jewsEveryone can read posts on this Forum, by people who need not be named for they take no steps to hide the fact, that are used for supposed support for 'oppressed Palestinians' and attacks on Israel's 'crimes against them' when they are blatantly just anti-Jewish verging on antisemitic attacks. The following questions are never answered by these people.1) Does Israel have a right to exist as a sovereign state within its current boundaries ? 2) If not, where should its people relocate to ?3) What steps can Israel take to stop existential attacks upon itself as described and decreed in the Palestinian Hamas charter ?4) Overall, how can the conflict between Israel and Palestine be ended such that their peoples can live peacefully side by side as neighbours ? 5) Is Israel such an awful and evil country that it deserves the almost unique daily attacks upon its behaviour ? When even cursory scanning of the media shows far, far worse atrocities being perpetrated in the Middle East (read what Iran does to its own political dissidents) and in Africa ?Perhaps some of the 'non-friends' of Israel that post on this Forum might answer these genuine questions or perhaps even members of the West Putney Green Party.

John Hawkes ● 31d

This is the article referred to by Mr Hawkes:https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/may/01/antisemitism-racism-jews-britainA British minority faces a murderous threat on our streets. Where are the so-called anti-racists?Jonathan FreedlandAs Jews face the deadly menace of antisemitism, they should not be alone. It’s time for their fellow Britons to step upFor me, it’s mostly sadness. Among others, the overriding emotion is fear. For some, it’s anger. It was certainly anger that was most vividly on display in Golders Green after the stabbing on Wednesday of two men, both Jews, in the broad daylight of a spring day – much of that fury directed at the government. When the prime minister came to visit, they shouted: “Keir Starmer, Jew harmer.”I understand that fury, even if I think it’s aimed at the wrong address. British Jews are angry because this was just the latest in a spate of attacks that has included, among other incidents, the torching of ambulances belonging to a Jewish charity and the attempt to burn down not one but two synagogues, all in the course of a few weeks. Jews want those in charge, the government, to make it stop.Ministers say the right things and pledge more money for the security measures that have been necessary at Jewish buildings for decades – the guards who stand outside Jewish schools and synagogues, the reinforced glass in our windows – and, of course, community organisations are grateful. But no one wants to live in a fortress. The solution cannot be to confine ourselves behind ever-higher walls.There are some indications that these attacks could be orchestrated by Iran, paying local people with a history of violence or criminality to attack Jews. Hence the demand for the government to proscribe Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organisation. It would be comforting to tell ourselves that this is all the work of foreign actors, that we have no homegrown problem of our own. But let’s say Tehran is involved: that it could recruit Britons so easily to the task of attacking Jews would tell its own story.For those reasons, it’s not enhanced security or a ban on the IRGC that will placate those who heckled Starmer in London on Thursday. What they want is a crackdown on what they call the “hate marches”, the demonstrations against Israel that have been staged in London and elsewhere since the Hamas attacks that killed 1,200 Israelis on 7 October 2023 and the Israeli bombardment that followed, killing 70,000 Palestinians and leaving Gaza a ruin.Those who attend such demonstrations insist that they are there purely to mourn the Palestinian dead and to oppose the state that is killing them. But Jews hear in some of the slogans and see in some of the placards – especially those that speak of a “Zionism” that controls the world through money and hidden power – a refrain that has been directed at Jews by antisemites for centuries, long before Israel ever existed. When they hear, chanted through a megaphone: “Say it loud, say it clear, Zionists not welcome here,” they hear an echo of those who persecuted and expelled them in the past – because they know that “Zionists” has long been the euphemism of choice for hardcore antisemites who really mean Jews.Incidentally, it’s not only Jews who take this view. Jonathan Hall KC, the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, who this week described the recent attacks on Jews as a “massive national security emergency”, has also said that talk of Jews and Israelis as “if they are demonic, as if they are the source of the world’s problems” has been “very present on the streets” and “it’s painting a target on Jews’ backs”. He has suggested a moratorium on the marches.Still, I’m uneasy about a ban. Part of my objection arises, obviously, from a belief in free speech. It’s also clear from the Palestine Action precedent that it would never work: the marches would still happen, almost certainly bigger than before. But I confess that part of it is a weary knowledge that such a ban would only make life worse for British Jews: we will be blamed for censoring free expression, cast as the shadowy string-pullers who put a gag on everyone else.But why is there even talk of a ban? The demonstrations would not need to be policed for hate speech if they were genuinely self-policed. Such a move should come naturally. It’s a good bet that every single person on those protests would call themselves a proud anti-racist. Indeed, they would say that’s a big part of why they’re there in the first place. Surely, then, they would want to be free of even the hint of racism. And yet organisers have never once approached mainstream Jewish groups, seeking guidance on how they might tackle this problem. (Doubtless, the march organisers will have talked to the “Jewish bloc” who go on these demonstrations, but getting a clean bill of health from those who already agree with you is not quite the same thing.)So if the organisers won’t act, perhaps the wider anti-racist movement will. And this gets to the heart of the matter. Governments can’t eradicate racism; only society itself can do that. But where are those who should be leading that effort? Where are those who are usually so vocal in their opposition to racism, now that one of Britain’s oldest minorities is facing a violent, murderous threat on the streets?Where are the actors and celebrities who ordinarily waste no time in declaring their solidarity with the oppressed, even those many thousands of miles away, now that British Jews are stabbed in London for no reason other than that they are visibly Jewish? The silence of those otherwise so noisy is remarkable – and we Jews hear it loud and clear.Perhaps it’s because the likes of Nigel Farage and Kemi Badenoch have already seized on the issue – Farage declaring it’s now “open season on Jewish people in this country”, something he would know all about, given that he went to a school where it was allegedly open season on Jews when one N Farage was a pupil – trying to find a rare patch of moral high ground, and no one wants to be in their company. Or, as one reader who wrote to me this week suggested, people are “conflicted” because the likes of Benjamin Netanyahu regularly conflate criticism of Israel with antisemitism, and so, “by implication, supporting Jews implies support for Israel”. I credit that reader with honesty: I suspect many of those now silent are hushed by the fear that supporting Jews stabbed in Golders Green will somehow be read as backing the Israel Defense Forces in Gaza. Better to say nothing instead.But since when did progressives take their lead on anything from Netanyahu? If you’re a supporter of the Palestinians and you don’t like the conflation of opposition to Israel with antisemitism, here’s a really easy way to reject that conflation: take a stand now against antisemitism and in support of British Jews.It should have already happened. There should have been a call for a mass demonstration in London this very weekend, making clear that, whatever their different views on the Middle East, the people of this country reject and repudiate deadly attacks on an ethnic minority, isolating and ostracising those who would contemplate or defend such violence. That it has not is an indictment of all those who claim their animating mission is the fight against racism.Hence the sadness I feel. Jews now are being asked, and asking each other, if they should consider leaving this country. For the record, my answer is: absolutely not. This is my home. This is where I belong. As Ed Miliband once said, contrasting himself with David Cameron, I may not have been sitting under the same oak tree for 500 years, but my family is rooted here. And yet the fact that this has even become a conversation is a terrible shock. Such things were meant to be in our distant past. If it shocks you too, then you need to say so. Right now.

Lucille Grant ● 32d

Interesting questions posed by Jonathan Freedland, a Jewish Guardian journalist and the antithesis of most other pro-Palestine scribes  writing for that paper such as the racist Owen Jones.https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/may/01/antisemitism-racism-jews-britain"A British minority faces a murderous threat on our streets. Where are the so-called anti-racists?"'So if the organisers (of the weekly antisemitic pro-Palestine marches) won’t act, perhaps the wider anti-racist movement will. And this gets to the heart of the matter. Governments can’t eradicate racism; only society itself can do that. But where are those who should be leading that effort? Where are those who are usually so vocal in their opposition to racism, now that one of Britain’s oldest minorities is facing a violent, murderous threat on the streets?Where are the actors and celebrities who ordinarily waste no time in declaring their solidarity with the oppressed, even those many thousands of miles away, now that British Jews are stabbed in London for no reason other than that they are visibly Jewish? The silence of those otherwise so noisy is remarkable – and we Jews hear it loud and clear'.The fallacy of his solution to the problem of course is, to quote Mrs Thatcher: "There is no such thing as society".She was emphasizing individual and family responsibility over reliance on government or abstract social constructs.For we know of course that antisemitism is in some people's or group's DNA.One only has to read comments on this Forum to recognize this fact.However we do have anti-discrimination and anti-incitement to violence laws so perhaps were a few of these fascists to be arrested and locked away this might act as some deterrence.One has the feeling that such actions would be called for by leftist 'progressives' were those being harassed or worse were Asian or Afro-Caribbean. 

John Hawkes ● 32d

"UK terror threat level is set to go up in the wake of Golders Green double stabbings"'Officials are expected to announce later today that the threat to the UK from all forms of terrorism will move from ‘substantial’ to ‘severe’, meaning an attack is now highly likely.The Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre (JTAC) is expected to announce that it has taken the decision to raise the level after a series of attacks on the Jewish community in recent weeks, culminating in the double stabbing of two Jewish men in Golders Green yesterday.Shabana Mahmood is set to make a statement setting out the reasons why it is necessary to upgrade the terrorism threat level, following concerns that ***the level of anti-Semitism in Britain has become a ‘national emergency***’.'A rich and sophisticated country with a large police force and an even larger army isforced to cower in the face of foreign Islamic terrorists and their British fellow travellers.'Two Green Party candidates are arrested on suspicion of stirring up racial hatred 'after posting anti-Semitic comments online'Two Green Party candidates were arrested this morning on suspicion of stirring up racial hatred after allegedly posting anti-Semitic comments online.The Metropolitan Police detained the two women aged 54 and 57 in London under section 19 of the Public Order Act before taking them into custody for questioning.The posts allegedly included messages such as 'England has a government overrepresented with Zionists Jews' and 'Ramming a synagogue isn't anti-Semitism. It's revenge.'I wonder how well the Green Party will do in West Putney in the local elections ?

John Hawkes ● 34d

Steven'John, having known Richard Carter for years, I can assure you that he is not personally anti-Semitic nor does he support Hamas or Iran or any of the other enemies of Israel and I am sure that he accepts that Israel has a right to exist.'But "If it walks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it probably is a duck" surely applies to someone who repeatedly posts anti-Israel (in reality anti-Jewish) sentiment that are thence easily interpreted as those of an antisemite.And if he supports the right of Israel to exist why does he not come right out and say so ?He is either playing the cocky naughty schoolboy making snide comments behind the back of his hand in class but will not speak out loud, or in fact you are wrong and he does not accept the right but is too frit to declare such an opinion openly.And it begs the question why it is just Israel he seems so critical of and to have such a hatred of.He once ate some dodgy chopped liver or he just does not like Jews ? When all can obviously see the appalling governance, mess and carnage caused by and going on in Middle Eastern Islamic states and others in Africa, he picks on thriving, democratic Israel.But you are right in grouping him amongst the puerile, immature left over this issue.One which in reality is of no concern to this country in general (other than Israel provides us with intelligence on potential Islamic terror attacks), and one which would come in at about position 153 in a list of what people will concern themselves with at the ballot box next month.

John Hawkes ● 34d

Mr Carter'Now, perhaps you can stop the whataboutery and get back to the actual subject of this thread?'Yes indeed.It concerns the rising tide of antisemitism world wide and in the UK.Driven by Islamic fanatics and terrorists who, according to the government and Met police are funded by and often proxies of Iran, a country to which I am sure you give tacit support to purely because of your susceptibility to TDS.And of course antisemitism is given cover if not encouraged by the criticism and bias, not always 'unconscious', by the likes of you who for months have posted nothing but bile and calumny regarding the actions of Israel.Israel, a country under proven existential threat by Palestinians and other Islamic groups and tribes that occupy the territories that surround it.Don't you feel ashamed that your words have encouraged attacks on British Jews who have attacked no one in this country and have contributed so much to what is positive and beneficial to it ?How many Jewish gangs have attacked and molested British women and girls ?But to be fair Muslim immigrants have given us the doner kebab and phone 'n vape shops.Now many British Jews fear to walk the streets of their homeland and face verbal attacks by left wing extremists particularly in the Green Party. And you have helped give rise to that fear.As have the extreme and bizarre comments from Francesca Albanese - UN rapporteur for Palestine, in her investigation into 'human rights abuses in Palestinian territory'.https://www.spiked-online.com/2026/04/29/these-blood-libels-are-endangering-jews/"There is not a scintilla of evidence for Albanese’s heinous tale of Israelis shoving men’s faces into toilets and then instructing dogs to rape them. She seems to have got it from Owen Jones of the Guardian, who has spent the past week mainstreaming this grotesque, evidence-free story. ‘Israel is raping Palestians with dogs’, says the headline to his piece, as he invites readers to think of this bigoted canard as absolute truth".Do you believe this to be true Mr Carter ?(BTW is there a UN rapporteur for Israel ? Because of the continuous threats and attacks it lives under, surely there should be ?)She further writes - "'Nothing justifies what Israel is doing'"'In recent weeks, Albanese issued a series of letters urging other countries to pressure Israel, including through sanctions, to end its deadly bombardment of the Gaza Strip. She also has been a strong supporter of arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court against Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for allegations of war crimes.Albanese said at a news conference last year that she has "always been attacked since the very beginning of my mandate," adding that criticism wouldn't force her to step down."It just infuriates me, it pisses me off, of course it does, but then it creates even more pressure not to step back," she said. "Human rights work is first and foremost amplifying the voice of people who are not heard."(The Palestinian voice is not heard !) (sic)She added that "of course, one condemned Hamas — how not to condemn Hamas? But at the same time, nothing justifies what Israel is doing."Note the mealy mouthed criticism of the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas compared to the vitriolic condemnation of Israel.Finally I ask you for the fifth, sixth (?) time -1) Do you think Israel has the right to exist as a sovereign state within its current boundaries ?

John Hawkes ● 35d