Forum Topic

It is difficult to understand Trump's policy towards Ukraine because his behaviour is so contradictory. But it is safe to say that he is opposed to the war, wishes it had never started and partly blames Ukraine for provoking the Russian invasion. His reasons, I think, are as follows:1) Trump fears the war might lead to nuclear conflict with Russia. Many people within the American administration feel the same way. It was for this reason that Biden restricted arms shipments to Ukraine and put conditions on their use.2) The war is depleting American arms supplies at a time when Trump needs them for the Middle East.3) Oil shortages are causing pump prices to rise in America, which is likely to help his opponents at the mid-term elections. Hence his decision to buy Russian diesel and suspend the sanctions against countries which import oil from Russia. It is worth noting, as Robert pointed out, that some EU countries continue to import Russian gas out of economic self-interest.4) Trump believes in spheres of interest. He thinks the best way of preserving US interests in the Americas is by respecting the spheres of interest of other great powers. So  just as he would be angry if Russia started to arm, say, Cuba, he understands Putin's anger over NATO's support for Ukraine. As a result he probably views the Maidan Revolution of 2014 when the pro-Russian president was deposed as ill-considered provocation of Russia. He also blames Ukraine for its intransigent attitude towards the separatists in the Donbas (e.g. the imposition of the Ukrainian language on Russian speakers) which provoked Putin's invasion.5) He is genuinely horrified by the bloodshed which has cost the lives of over 100 00 Ukrainians and over half a million Russians, for which he blames both sides.This is not to say that Trump actually approves of the Russian invasion or wants Russia to win. The fact that America continues to supply Ukraine with missiles and share intelligence contradicts that view. What he wants is a deal but he doesn't care if this deal means that Ukraine has to cede territory to Russia.

Steven Rose ● 13d

Steven, I wouldn't argue that Ukrainian democracy is perfect and there hasn't been outside interference in its elections (but then I wouldn't say that about the UK). Too me, it's undeniable that Russia is the agressor and Putin is a facist dictator based on the way he murders his own Russian opponents. If he succeeds in Ukraine, where next: the Baltic states, Finland, Poland, Germany ...?Putin thought he'd walk into Ukraine, execute Zelensky, and take over. He underestimated the Ukrainians and the support they'd get for their new fledgling democracy after his illegal but unopposed annexation of Crimea. It's sad that so many lives are being lost on both sides - perhaps Trump’s peacekeeping attempts would be more successful if he castigated Putin more; he could accuse Putin of being a child murderer but I suppose after the US bombing of a school in Iran that could be difficult. A number of people in the US aren't happy about Trump paying Putin for oil products who then assists Iran with drones that kill and injure US troops in the middle east. To be honest, it's all a mess.As I said before, fuel costs have been accelerated recently by the US action causing the closure of the Straight of Hormaz and Iranian attacks on oil facilities as well as well as Ukrainian action damaging Russian energy plants. Some of those facilities could take years to repair.But, I agree Trump is panicking about gas and diesel prices as that will be a major factor in the midterm elections, and possibly whether he and other might face impeachment - and the Epstein accusations - in the new year. So I guess he'll do anything to stop that; so it's watch this space?

Michael Ixer ● 13d

When I was in Ukraine last year I met an ex-POW who had spent two years in Russian prisons before getting out on a prisoner exchange.  His story is utterly harrowing; he had most of us in tears.  What makes it relevant is that he spent part of his time in the same prison as the now 74 year old Stephen Hubbard.  The "humanitarian" Putin regime treated Hubbard in exactly the same brutally inhuman way as they treated others captured in their war of aggression against Ukraine.I am hoping that if Hubbard does not tell his own appalling story then our Ukrainian friend will do so on his behalf.Never has the word "humanitarian" been so grievously misused.Personally, I see no sign that Putin wants a deal that does not involve capitulation by Ukraine.  And he isn't going to get that.  They are literally fighting for the future of their country as an independent nation.Last night at the Wimbledon Bookfest I saw Luke Harding, who has been reporting from the front line in Ukraine for many years (i.e. well before the 2022 invasion), in debate with Tim Marshall (who wrote the excellent "Prisoners of Geography").  Harding is absolutely clear on the nature of the Russian regime and on the prospects for a lasting peace short of Ukraine being reabsorbed into the Russian Empire.Here is a link to an AFP report on X, who interviewed the Ukrainian I had met: https://x.com/AFP/status/1847305930569867264For more on Hubbard here is a (very) long piece on the legalities of his situation and status:https://www.diplomacyandlaw.com/post/stephen-hubbard-freed

Jonathan Callaway ● 8d