Forum Topic

Well, in answer to your original query (your post of 29/10/26 16:38:00) my answer would effectively be as in the first post on this thread: I would “assume that a complaint would not have been made unless it were justified, extend [my] sympathy to the contributor concerned and decry the growth of anti-Semitism in the country.”You, on the other hand, like Robert Wheeler, claim implausibly in the case of Sharon Hunt that you “would want to be in full possession of the facts before forming a judgment.” (the examination of which would, according to a diocesan spokesperson, would take place “over the coming months.” So don’t hold your breath for the answer any time soon).Frankly, I don’t believe your temporising for a moment. Both you and Robert have, rightly, been very quick to condemn any suspected incident of anti-Semitism, but strangely in this case are sheltering behind a very dubious legalistic excuse. To use a contemporary idiom, that’s a two-tier reaction and it doesn’t reflect well on either of you. Sue Hammond at least is honest in being clear that she doesn’t care and saying that she’s “bored with it already.”After all, it’s not as if racism in the CoE would be a surprise: in 2024 it reported that priests can face “enormous prejudice” especially if you are not “white-skinned”, noting that priests from minority ethnic backgrounds face “a lot of barriers” in finding permanent roles after their curacies. (https://www.churchofengland.org/media/press-releases/behind-stained-glass)

Richard Carter ● 13h