Forum Topics

Gerry Adams

A short while after the High Court in London upheld the decision to throw out the case against Kneecap rapper Mo Chara, now the civil case against Gerry Adams has been withdrawn.In a statement, he said he "welcomed the decision" and attended the case "out of respect" for the claimants. Adams' lawyers had argued the case was based on "an assortment of hearsay" and that it had been brought several decades too late.They also suggested it had been taken as an abuse of legal process, and that the civil action was not about trying to prove liability for the three bomb attacks, but to try to establish a much wider process which "the court is not intended to perform or is equipped to perform".Adams added; "I contested this case and defended myself against the smears and false accusations being levelled against me. I asserted the legitimacy of the Republican cause and the right of the people of Ireland to freedom and self-determination. I do so again."It seems like another case of British justice making the right decision in the end, but surely this should never have gone to court? Adams has been charged with IRA membership several times in the past but without legal success. This case boiled down to little more than hearsay and  speculation from many years ago. The defence also said this case should be dismissed for being brought too late, they questioned why the three accusers waited decades to bring their case. In the end, I feel for ALL the victims of the Troubles, including all those that suffered by the actions if the IRA, The British Army, the UDA etc. This is not a day for celebration or victory speeches; it is more appropriate to remember the victims and appreciate how much has been gained by leaving the past behind and taking the hard road to peace.

Gerry Boyce ● 225d0 Comments ● 225d

To help understanding, I turned to Google

"Zionism was originally a minority political belief within Jewish communities when it emerged in the late 19th century. While the idea of a spiritual return to Zion (Jerusalem) has been central to Judaism for centuries, the modern political movement to establish a secular Jewish state in Palestine faced significant opposition or indifference from a majority of Jews, particularly in Western Europe and the United States, who largely favored assimilation, as well as from many Orthodox groups who viewed it as a theological violation. Origins as a Minority Movement Late 19th-Century Context: Emerging in response to intense antisemitism in Europe (specifically Russian pogroms), Zionism was initially a minority movement of intellectuals and Eastern European "Lovers of Zion" (Ḥovevei Ẕiyyon).Opposing Views: Before the 1930s, many Jewish groups were actively anti-Zionist, promoting alternative solutions to persecution, such as socialist integration or cultural autonomy in their home countries.Early 20th Century: Prior to World War I, Zionism was largely supported by a minority, mainly consisting of activists from Russia and led by Central Europeans. Shift to DominanceZionism gained momentum as a dominant force over the next few decades due to several factors: Antisemitism & Rising Violence: Escalating anti-Semitic violence in Germany, Russia, and Eastern Europe made the Zionist goal of a safe haven more appealing.The Holocaust: The Nazi genocide destroyed the centers of European Jewish life, causing a radical shift in Jewish public opinion toward the necessity of an independent state.British Support: The 1917 Balfour Declaration, where Britain expressed support for a "national home for the Jewish people," gave the movement significant international legitimacy. Evolution of the MovementEven as late as 1939, while the Jewish population in Palestine was growing, Zionist supporters were still a minority of the world's total Jewish population. The transformation from a fringe movement into a mainstream Jewish belief took place gradually, accelerated dramatically by the Holocaust and the subsequent establishment of Israel in 1948."

David Ainsworth ● 228d3 Comments ● 228d