Forum Topics

What did the EU ever do for us?

What did the EU ever do for us? Not much, apart from:• providing 57% of our trade;• structural funding to areas hit by industrial decline;• clean beaches and rivers;• cleaner air;• lead free petrol;• restrictions on landfill dumping;• a recycling culture;• cheaper mobile charges;• cheaper air travel;• improved consumer protection and food labelling;a ban on growth hormones and other harmful food additives;• better product safety;• single market competition bringing quality improvements and better industrial performance;• break up of monopolies;• Europe-wide patent and copyright protection;• no paperwork or customs for exports throughout the single market;• price transparency and removal of commission on currency exchanges across the Eurozone;• freedom to travel, live and work across Europe;• funded opportunities for young people to undertake study or work placements abroad;• access to European health services;• labour protection and enhanced social welfare;• smoke-free workplaces;• equal pay legislation;• holiday entitlement;• the right not to work more than a 48-hour week without overtime;• strongest wildlife protection in the world;• improved animal welfare in food production;• EU-funded research and industrial collaboration;• EU representation in international forums;• bloc EEA negotiation at the WTO;• EU diplomatic efforts to uphold the nuclear non-proliferation treaty;• European arrest warrant;• cross border policing to combat human trafficking, arms and drug smuggling; counter terrorism intelligence;• European civil and military co-operation in post-conflict zones in Europe and Africa;• support for democracy and human rights across Europe and beyond;• investment across Europe contributing to better living standards and educational, social and cultural capital.All of this is nothing compared with its greatest achievements: the EU has for 60 years been the foundation of peace between European neighbours after centuries of bloodshed.It furthermore assisted the extraordinary political, social and economic transformation of 13 former dictatorships, now EU members, since 1980.Now the union faces major challenges brought on by neoliberal economic globalisation, and worsened by its own systemic weaknesses. It is taking measures to overcome these. We in the UK should reflect on whether our net contribution of £7bn out of total government expenditure of £695bn is good value. We must play a full part in enabling the union to be a force for good in a multi-polar global future.The above was written by Simon Sweeney, lecturer in international political economy at the University of York, and illustrates what we are in danger of throwing away as a result of the absurd decision to leave the EU.

Richard Carter ● 2813d65 Comments ● 2803d

Dover House Rd becomes one way 6-9am Monday-Saturday

What do you think? Suggests a done decision with no "wider consultation" Thought it best to open this to the Putney community.Copies of emails sent to me by Dover House shopkeepers and response they received from Wandsworth council. "Wandsworth council has made the decision to close Doverhouse Road from Putney Heath to the Upper Richmond Road between the hours of 6am – 9am Monday to Saturday on a six months trial.The council has pushed through this road closure under an experimental traffic order for which they say no formal consultation is required. They have been manipulated into making the decision by the residents of the Doverhouse estate who carried out their own traffic survey which the council has accepted. The Residents call Doverhouse Road a rat run. We the shop keepers at the bottom of Doverhouse road argue that it is a long straight road for the use of both buses and cars to gain access from Putney Heath to the Upper Richmond Road. Only when cars turn off Doverhouse Road into the side streets would we consider it to be a rat run. If the road is closed the traffic will potentially reroute itself onto the next available route, Putney Park Lane and Carslake Road and then filter through to the Upper Richmond Road through various routes giving extra traffic for those Residents. Wandsworth residents who live on Putney Heath, Roehampton Lane the , Danebury Avenue Estate and along the A3 corridor, will all experience delays and longer journey times. We are proposing to the Council that everyone who may be affected should be consulted and that the traffic problems are rectified on the Doverhouse Road (I.e. stop the double parking of vehicles at the bottom of Doverhouse Road to allow the free flow of traffic one lane in either direction).TheDoverhouse problem is now being made a problem for the whole Community. We need your support to stop this road closure. We need you to inform all your friends and neighbours who you think will be affected. Please contact the following email addresses to voice your concerns immediately. Nick.O’Donnell@richmondandwandsworth.gov.ukgreeningj@parliament.ukSteffi.sutters@me.comClark.J.Cooper@wandsworth.gov.uk Just to add some comments from the Council’s perspective.  There were two petitions received around the desire for timed restrictions on Dover House Road and the criteria for their qualification was met.  Details can be found in the Council’s Overview and Scrutiny report (https://democracy.wandsworth.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=574&MId=5739&Ver=4).  The Council has restricted the proposal to just operate in the morning between 06:00 and 09:00 Monday to Saturday and to be introduced under an experimental traffic order.  An experimental traffic order carries no formal consultation requirements but it allows representation to be made during the experimental period (which is a minimum of 6 month and a maximum of 18 months) and an information letter will be circulated to residents (the area to be agreed with Cllrs) ahead of the start of this trial.  In terms of traffic redistribution, we have collated a series of “before” data and will monitor the effects of the scheme on all local roads.  The advantage of an experimental order and limited hours of operation is it allows the “soft testing” of measures and any decisions can be reversed, tweaked or made permanent depending on the outcomes. Officers have exhausted a lot of time looking at the traffic issues in this area and considering a multitude of options.  We have engaged on multiple occasions face to face with a number of businesses and residents in the area and are always willing to do so.    Regards Nick     

Mary Emmett ● 2866d121 Comments ● 2803d

Reducing our reliance on cars

I know this has come up before, but it's worth raising again because cutting fossil fuel use is absolutely essential if we're ever to tackle global warming. Since the government has feebly passed the buck to local authorities on dealing with the closely linked issue of air pollution, we have to turn to our own borough, but its record is not strong. It has pressed for hybrid buses to be introduced in Putney, and that has had a definite effect (and anyway credit for that should go to TfL), though Putney High Street is still well over the legal limit for NO2, but otherwise its record is lacklustre.Now Robert Molteno of Wandsworth Living Streets has produced an interesting analysis (on which I've drawn: thank you, Robert) of the latest planned increases in parking charges in the borough - for example, increasing an annual resident's parking charge from £146 to £161, an increase running at twice the rate of inflation; the charge for a second car is only £35 more than for a resident's first car. This would have been a great opportunity to further improve air quality (by, for example, introduce higher Parking Permit charges for dirty diesels, to discourage car ownership or to raIse funds to build pedestrian and cycle-friendly infrastructure. What a missed opportunity!The paper does have a goal for reducing the number of cars owned in the borough - but the aimed reduction is only 9,218 by 2041. This is a decrease of only 11% over 27 years – or an average of 341 fewer cars (less than half a per cent of the total number) in our borough each year.So unless we can press the borough to attempt something stronger, it's down to all of us to act. One way is to walk and cycle more, thus reducing our car use. No doubt the usual suspects will complain about cycling on the pavement or people wearing lycra, but I hope this will be received more positively.One weak reason people use to argue against cycling (apart from the obvious one of the real danger from heedless - or worse - drivers, is the complaint that you can't take your shopping home on a bike. That is a particularly weak argument: for example, I've just brought home 10 kilos (22 lbs) of shopping in two panniers, and before someone says it's all right for me, I'm a youngster, I can assure you that I am very far from that.With effects of dirty air and global warming becoming ever more serious, it's past time we pressed our borough (and the government) to act, and also to act ourselves. We cannot go on as things are.

Richard Carter ● 2831d38 Comments ● 2809d