Forum Topics

Burnham’s £55M Homes Loan To Man City Owner

Is this brewing into yet another Labour Coverup?Angela Rayner was last night accused of refusing to investigate potentially 'favourable' loans given to the owners of Manchester City by Andy Burnham.According to the letter sent to Ms Rayner last month, by March this year the loans given to ADUG made up 97 per cent of a taxpayer-funded investment scheme for developers to invest in Manchester.The Mail on Sunday can reveal that a Manchester-based property developer has called on the Housing Secretary to investigate £55 million of housing project loans made to the Abu Dhabi United Group In the private letter, seen by this newspaper, the developers question why so much money was lent to ADUG with no requirement to build affordable homes needed in the area.They also claim that 'no due diligence' was carried out over the loans, made in 2017 by the Greater Manchester Combined Authority (GMCA), which was then led by Mr Burnham as Mayor.The Prime Minister is coming under increasing pressure to reveal the full extent of his connections with ADUG, which is owned by Sheikh Mansour, the deputy prime minister of the United Arab Emirates and a member of its royal family. Only last week it was revealed that Mr Burnham had met Manchester City bosses at least six times as Mayor, despite previously claiming he had had just one 'significant' meeting with them.Man City were last month found guilty by an independent Premier League commission of breaching financial rules between 2009 and 2018, and creating 'sham contracts' to inflate sponsorship deals by £830 million. When the verdict was revealed, the PM was heavily criticised for saying he would be 'really concerned' to lose Sheikh Mansour's investment.But despite receiving the request to investigate last month, Ms Rayner – the Cabinet Minister who would have the authority to launch such an inquiry – has yet to make any public comment. Last night, Tory party chairman Kevin Hollinrake suggested that she was failing to act because of 'a clear conflict of interest'.He told The Mail on Sunday: 'She is being asked to look into deals made under the man who she campaigned for and who just gave her a Cabinet job, and she is sitting on her hands.Katie Lam, Tory local government spokesman, said: 'The chumocracy at the heart of Burnham's dealings in Manchester deserves proper scrutiny, not political protection. Rayner should put the public interest ahead of party loyalty.''Developers raised serious concerns with her department more than a month ago and have heard nothing. If the PM has nothing to hide, he should welcome a proper independent investigation.'https://mol.im/a/16217377

Sue Hammond ● 12d3 Comments ● 6d

UK boycott of Israeli settlements

Today Ed Miliband is expected to announce a 'reset' in Britain's relations with Israel with a boycott of trade with settlements on the West Bank. The purpose is to promote the establishment of an independent Palestinian state on the West Bank as part of a two state solution to the conflict.Can such a policy be effectively implemented? The answer is, with difficulty. While British firms might be banned from selling to the settlements, in practice it is impossible to distinguish between goods  coming from the West Bank from those produced in Israel.Will this policy deter Israel from further expansion into the West Bank? Absolutely not. The settlements will simply find other suppliers and other markets. Will it deter settler violence? Hardly. The religious fanatics who attack Palestinian villages will probably be emboldened, believing that the whole world is against the Jewish people.Will there be consequences for Britain as a result of this policy? Almost certainly. Israel will retaliate, possibly by banning imports of British goods or restricting the sale of pharmaceuticals to Britain or by refusing to cooperate with the security services on Islamist threats to Britain. There will also be consequences for Britain's trade with America as the Trump administration strongly opposes such action.Then why do it? And why do it now given that there will shortly be an election in Israel at which Netanyahu might be lose power? The answer is that Labour are essentially a performative party who have no grasp of practical policies but simply engage in virtue signalling, advertising their commitment to various ideals. And I would not exclude from their motives a wish to outflank the Greens, who are likely to attract the vote of those who support the Palestinian cause.Then

Steven Rose ● 52d121 Comments ● 8d