Forum Topics

I knew that Reform could not resist fluffing this one.

"Zia Yusuf has been monstered after he complained about black men being offered screening for prostate cancer.Reform UK’s home affairs spokesman said it was further evidence that the UK is a “two tier country” following the murder of Henry Nowak.The 18-year-old was arrested and handcuffed as he lay dying after being stabbed by Vickrum Digwa, who had falsely accused him of racism.Ministers announced earlier this week that black men aged between 45 and 74 will be offered prostate cancer screening because they have double the risk of contracting the disease compared to the general population.Reacting on X, Yusuf said: “On the day the whole political establishment claims we do not live in a two tier country, they announce this. Note, the NHS makes NO drugs available exclusively to white people.”However, social media users – including politicians from all parties – condemned Yusuf’s attempt to create racial division about a potentially life-saving NHS initiative.Former Lib Dem leader Tim Farron said: “Are there any doctors who belong to Reform UK who can quetly tell Zia to stop being a wazzock about this stuff?”Labour MP and trained surgeon Dr Zubir Ahmed said: “How can someone as thick as you aspire to hold any form of public office? Please go and ask your father how medical screening works, it’s time you were educated.”Fellow Labour MP Luke Charters said: “What is wrong with you? Black men are at significantly higher risk of prostate cancer. This isn’t ‘two-tier Britain’. It’s basic medicine.”Tory MP Ben Obese-Jecty advised Yusuf to speak to Dr David Bull, a GP who was until recently Reform’s chairman.Tory councillor Festus Akinbusoye said: “Bro. Have you lost your mind? Do you understand how targeted medical intervention works? What is wrong with you Zia? Seriously!”Other social media users joined in the near-universal condemnation of Yusuf’s remarks." (Huff Post today)

David Ainsworth ● 16h1 Comments ● 15h

Hallelujah - my redeemer Burnham Cometh

Unless there is a big surprise from Reform in his own backyard, it looks as if we will soon have a new Labour PM in the form of 'Mr Manchester' Andy Burnham when he is elected in the Makerfield constituency and his own Party then forces Kier Starmer out.Well at lease he cannot be criticised for lack of experience in politics because since he left Cambridge he has never had what some people (me !) would say is a 'proper job'.He has been a Labour advisor, Councillor, MP, Minister and Mayor.But does he know what it is like to compete for and hold down a role in the private or even the public sector and have to competitively compete in the market place of life ?And he does seem to have changed his mind over social issues, most notably gender identification.Some good points from Andrew Neil in the MailOnline.https://www.dailymail.com/debate/article-15859349/ANDREW-NEIL-real-beef-Streeting-Burnham-promoting-dreary-socialist-agenda-70s.html(Sorry Mr Ainsworth. Could not find anything pertinent on this issue from your beloved Guardian !)'My beef with the Streetings and Burnhams of the Labour Party – indeed with the current Leftward drift of the party as a whole – is how they propose to make us more equal: higher taxes – especially on the wealth creators – more welfare, more government ownership and more regulation. In short, the same dreary socialist concoction that brought us to our knees when Labour was in power in the 1970s.I recently suggested Labour should rebadge itself the Welfare Party. But perhaps the Back-to-the-Future Party would be more appropriate.Burnham is especially guilty of this. In the Makerfield by-election, which he hopes will be his springboard to the Labour leadership, it’s almost as if he’s running against Margaret Thatcher and wants to return us to a mythical pre-Thatcherite idyll.Even though she stepped down as Prime Minister 36 years ago (and died 13 years ago) she gets it in the neck from Burnham for all the ills of the constituency for which he has suddenly decided he wants to be MP'.By railing against ‘40 years of Thatcherite neoliberalism’ he (Burnham) is burnishing his credentials with the Labour Left, which has always despaired that so little was done to reverse the Thatcher revolution during the Blairite era.He intends to put that right. In his response to Blair’s mini-manifesto he argued for a ‘very interventionist’ government with ‘strong public control and direction’ over investment and key industries such as transport, energy and even housing – the antithesis of the New Labour years. And all in the name of a more equal society.He intends to put that right. In his response to Blair’s mini-manifesto he argued for a ‘very interventionist’ government with ‘strong public control and direction’ over investment and key industries such as transport, energy and even housing – the antithesis of the New Labour years. And all in the name of a more equal society.So let’s look at how that might work out. But before we do, a word about inequality. Left-wing rhetoric increasingly implies that the rich and well-paid barely pay any taxes at all.Nothing could be further from the truth. Our tax receipts are more dependent on a small number of the well-off than almost any other advanced economy.The top 10 per cent of income-earners stump up 60 per cent of all income tax revenues. The top 1 per cent pay 30 per cent and the richest 0.1 per cent account for 11 per cent – which is a bigger share of income tax receipts than the lowest 50 per cent of earners contribute.'I wonder how it will all work out ?

John Hawkes ● 4d30 Comments ● 21h

Trump says ‘crazy’ Netanyahu has made everyone hate Israel in furious phone call

In the Independent (and many others) "Donald Trump lashed out at Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu in an expletive-laden phone call over Israel’s continued strikes in Lebanon on Monday, according to US media reports.The US president was reportedly furious after Iran threatened to suspend peace talks with the US over Israel’s strikes on Hezbollah in Lebanon, telling the Israeli prime minister that “everybody hates Israel” because of his actions."But of course:-"In his public remarks after the two leaders spoke, Trump announced that a partial truce had been agreed between Israel and Hezbollah and that the call had been “very productive”."And yet:-"But behind closed doors Trump is said to have yelled at Netanyahu over the phone, calling him “f****** crazy”, Axios reported late on Monday, citing two unnamed US officials familiar with the call.“You’re f****** crazy. You’d be in prison if it weren’t for me. I’m saving your a**. Everybody hates you now. Everybody hates Israel because of this,” Trump said, according to a US official’s summary of the remarks.Another source who briefed Axios about the call said Trump was “p***ed” and at one point yelled at Netanyahu: “What the f*** are you doing?”Trump’s intervention came after Israel expanded its ground operations in southern Lebanon. Israel and Hezbollah agreed a fragile ceasefire in mid April, but the militant group resumed attacks after Israeli strikes in Lebanon that Israel characterised as self-defence."It is quite something to watch world class bullshitters at the peak of their performative game.It's like 1960s TV wrestling matches, but one still watches it.------------------------------------"Israeli drone strikes in southern Lebanon on Tuesday killed eight people, including a father and his son and daughter, a day after US President Donald Trump said Israel and Hezbollah agreed to dial back fighting."

David Ainsworth ● 1d3 Comments ● 1d

Knife crime is down (ONS)

The Ben Kinsella Trust:-"The latest Office for National Statistics figures bring some welcome news: knife crime is continuing to fall."Offences are down by 10% compared with last year (December 2024 to December 2025), with 49,151 recorded offences. That is a significant reduction from the post‑pandemic peak of 54,548 and indicates that progress is being made in tackling a problem that has also been described as an epidemic in the recent past.Encouragingly, reductions have been seen across most police force areas. However, the national picture is being driven by particularly strong falls in areas with the highest volumes of knife crime. London has seen a 17% decrease, the North-West (including Greater Manchester and Merseyside) is down 13%, and the West Midlands has recorded a 12% fall. Together, these areas account for a large proportion of knife crime nationally, so changes there have a substantial impact on the overall figures.There are also other positive signs. Homicides have fallen by 6%, and hospital admissions for knife‑related injuries are also down by 10%. Fewer lives lost and fewer people seriously harmed is always something we should recognise, and credit is due to everyone working tirelessly on prevention, enforcement and support on the ground.That said, we must be realistic about the scale of the challenge that remains. Knife crime offences still stand at 49,151, a long way above the Government’s target of reducing knife crime by half, to 27,303, by June 2034. Progress, while welcome, cannot lead to complacency."

David Ainsworth ● 1d0 Comments ● 1d